Alfonso de Urresti request the creation of a commission of inquiry in the House. RN senator Antonio Horvath said he was "disappointed" the Government and warned that its support for this "is not unconditional."
The head of the socialist bloc of deputies, Alfonso de Urresti, Wednesday announced it will present a request to create an investigative commission that investigates the links of the Ministers of Environment and Energy, Maria Ignacia Benitez and Laurence Golborne, with the companies that drive HidroAysén.
The initiative aims to assess the inability of the two Secretaries of State towards the ministerial committee that will decide ultimately on the hydroelectric megaproject appeals against already announced.
"I would ask the press to review the curriculum of the Minister of Environment to know who advised before Minister: Today companies are behind this project, "said De Urresti.
On" the minister Golborne must know whether it is actually participation. The previously noted that this was a tremendously important project, and want to know if that disables it, "added the senator.
Horvath: I'm not unconditional Government
not only from the opposition in Parliament seek to reverse the decision on Monday by the Environmental Evaluation Committee Coyhaique. Representatives of the Defense Committee of Patagonia and even Sen. Antonio Horvath RN-known for its environmental discourse-announced legal action in this regard.
"We have witnessed that it has violated environmental institutions. The technical reports of the officials concerned were changed from rejection to approval with conditions to be fulfilled in the future. That is absolutely the illegal, "said Horvath.
"Many people support the government and citizens and particularly its environmental program, and those people are disappointed. I'm loyal, but not unconditionally" to the government, added the lawmaker.
For its part, Macarena Soler, legal coordinator of the Defense Council of Patagonia, said that in the next 30 days your organization will present resources and claims protection annulments.
"For us HidroAysén is a bad project because a project is unnecessary from the point of energy efficient and also a bad environmental project in technical terms, as is a bad project had only one option: to be rejected, "he said.
environmentalist remarked that" This does not correspond have adopted is not for the institutions to function as if it were a puppet show, therefore, obviously we hope that the courts reverse the decision and require that procedures are in accordance with law, "he concluded.
Source: EcoAmerica
0 comments:
Post a Comment